Tons, that is...
Of one hundred dollar bills...
Just in case you missed it, from How the US sent $12bn in cash to Iraq. And watched it vanish, by David Pallister, Thursday, February 8, 2007:
The US flew nearly $12bn in shrink-wrapped $100 bills into Iraq, then distributed the cash with no proper control over who was receiving it and how it was being spent.
The staggering scale of the biggest transfer of cash in the history of the Federal Reserve has been graphically laid bare by a US congressional committee.
In the year after the invasion of Iraq in 2003 nearly 281 million notes, weighing 363 tonnes, were sent from New York to Baghdad for disbursement to Iraqi ministries and US contractors. Using C-130 planes, the deliveries took place once or twice a month with the biggest of $2,401,600,000 on June 22 2004, six days before the handover.
Details of the shipments have emerged in a memorandum prepared for the meeting of the House committee on oversight and government reform which is examining Iraqi reconstruction. Its chairman, Henry Waxman, a fierce critic of the war, said the way the cash had been handled was mind-boggling. "The numbers are so large that it doesn't seem possible that they're true. Who in their right mind would send 363 tonnes of cash into a war zone?"
The memorandum details the casual manner in which the US-led Coalition Provisional Authority disbursed the money, which came from Iraqi oil sales, surplus funds from the UN oil-for-food programme and seized Iraqi assets.
"One CPA official described an environment awash in $100 bills," the memorandum says. "One contractor received a $2m payment in a duffel bag stuffed with shrink-wrapped bundles of currency. Auditors discovered that the key to a vault was kept in an unsecured backpack.
"They also found that $774,300 in cash had been stolen from one division's vault. Cash payments were made from the back of a pickup truck, and cash was stored in unguarded sacks in Iraqi ministry offices. One official was given $6.75m in cash, and was ordered to spend it in one week before the interim Iraqi government took control of Iraqi funds."
The minutes from a May 2004 CPA meeting reveal "a single disbursement of $500m in security funding labelled merely 'TBD', meaning 'to be determined'."
The memorandum concludes: "Many of the funds appear to have been lost to corruption and waste ... thousands of 'ghost employees' were receiving pay cheques from Iraqi ministries under the CPA's control. Some of the funds could have enriched both criminals and insurgents fighting the United States."
According to Stuart Bowen, the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, the $8.8bn funds to Iraqi ministries were disbursed "without assurance the monies were properly used or accounted for". But, according to the memorandum, "he now believes that the lack of accountability and transparency extended to the entire $20bn expended by the CPA".
To oversee the expenditure the CPA was supposed to appoint an independent certified public accounting firm. "Instead the CPA hired an obscure consulting firm called North Star Consultants Inc. The firm was so small that it reportedly operates out of a private home in San Diego." Mr Bowen found that the company "did not perform a review of internal controls as required by the contract".
However, evidence before the committee suggests that senior American officials were unconcerned about the situation because the billions were not US taxpayers' money. Paul Bremer, the head of the CPA, reminded the committee that "the subject of today's hearing is the CPA's use and accounting for funds belonging to the Iraqi people held in the so-called Development Fund for Iraq. These are not appropriated American funds. They are Iraqi funds. I believe the CPA discharged its responsibilities to manage these Iraqi funds on behalf of the Iraqi people."
Bremer's financial adviser, retired Admiral David Oliver, is even more direct. The memorandum quotes an interview with the BBC World Service. Asked what had happened to the $8.8bn he replied: "I have no idea. I can't tell you whether or not the money went to the right things or didn't - nor do I actually think it's important."
Q: "But the fact is billions of dollars have disappeared without trace."
Oliver: "Of their money. Billions of dollars of their money, yeah I understand. I'm saying what difference does it make?"
Mr Bremer, whose disbanding of the Iraqi armed forces and de-Ba'athification programme have been blamed as contributing to the present chaos, told the committee: "I acknowledge that I made mistakes and that with the benefit of hindsight, I would have made some decisions differently. Our top priority was to get the economy moving again. The first step was to get money into the hands of the Iraqi people as quickly as possible."
Millions of civil service families had not received salaries or pensions for months and there was no effective banking system. "It was not a perfect solution," he said. "Delay might well have exacerbated the nascent insurgency and thereby increased the danger to Americans."
Key quotes, with commentary:
"Some of the funds could have enriched both criminals and insurgents fighting the United States."
You don't say....
"However, evidence before the committee suggests that senior American officials were unconcerned about the situation because the billions were not US taxpayers' money."
And we all believe that no US taxpayer money was involved, of course.
"I believe the CPA discharged its responsibilities to manage these Iraqi funds on behalf of the Iraqi people."
Just another reason to be an insurgent....
In an incredible article about a jaw-dropping story, loaded with quality quotes, this passage stands out in particular:
Retired Admiral David Oliver:
"I can't tell you whether or not the money went to the right things or didn't - nor do I actually think it's important."
Q: "But the fact is billions of dollars have disappeared without trace."
Oliver: "Of their money. Billions of dollars of their money, yeah I understand. I'm saying what difference does it make?"
If legitimate Iraqi authorities had full possession and control of that money, and if it then disappeared on their watch, then, to a certain extent, I would agree, except for one major factor: the money may be funding the insurgents who are killing our troops!
Repeating the last two paragraphs of the article:
Mr Bremer, whose disbanding of the Iraqi armed forces and de-Ba'athification programme have been blamed as contributing to the present chaos, told the committee: "I acknowledge that I made mistakes and that with the benefit of hindsight, I would have made some decisions differently. Our top priority was to get the economy moving again. The first step was to get money into the hands of the Iraqi people as quickly as possible."
Millions of civil service families had not received salaries or pensions for months and there was no effective banking system. "It was not a perfect solution," he said. "Delay might well have exacerbated the nascent insurgency and thereby increased the danger to Americans."
No, Mr. Bremer; handing out Iraqi money like that, undoubtedly enriching insurgents and criminals, with no accountability, and thus undoubtedly infuriating the decent people of Iraq and making them angry at the US occupation ... THAT is what exacerbates the insurgency and places our troops in greater risk.
But, what do you care, Mr. Bremer? You're not wearing a uniform trying to secure Iraq.
President Bush, this was not some isolated incident that was presented to you as a fait accompli; this was ongoing US policy. You could have prevented it or stopped it; you could have at least held accountable those responsible. You are guilty, too, Mr. President, of aiding and abetting the insurgents and endangering our troops' lives. You helped create the very problems in Iraq that you now need a surge in troops to deal with.
You need to be held accountable for this, Mr. President.
Obviously, of by far the greatest concern are the US and Allied troops who are in danger, and who have been killed, wounded or who have disappeared in this conflict, together with all the innocent Iraqis who are suffering.
But let's not lose sight of our accumulating federal debt, which has been increasing at roughly half a trillion dollars per year since 9/11.
Fiscal Year Ending: ----- Outstanding Federal Debt:
09/30/2006 ------------ $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 ------------ $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 ------------ $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 ------------ $6,783,231,062,743.62
09/30/2002 ------------ $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 ------------ $5,807,463,412,200.06
09/30/2000 ------------ $5,674,178,209,886.86
The figure as of May 30 was at $8,819,277,425,299.78.
Current debt information is here.
Didn't this new accumulation of debt occur when a so-called Republican was in the White House, and with a Republican-controlled Congress?
This is part of the Bush-43 legacy, too.
363 tons of one hundred dollar bills....
No comments:
Post a Comment