Monday, November 12, 2007

Pak Sex Slave Ring in UK, Part 2

We continue from Part 1 with our look at a Pakistani sex slave ring in the UK.

Before we continue reviewing the in-depth report entitled Mothers of Prevention, it is worth reviewing some other articles for further background on the incidents. I will have two other articles in this post, plus two in another, in addition to the remainder of Mothers of Prevention subsequently.

We begin with Grooming of white girls for sex is exposed as two Asian men jailed by Lucy Bannerman and Richard Ford, August 11, 2007.

A hidden world in which Asian men "groom" young white girls for sex has been exposed with the jailing yesterday of two men for child-abuse offences.

Zulfqar Hussain, 46, and Qaiser Naveed, 32, from east Lancashire, were each jailed for five years and eight months after exploiting two girls aged under 16 by plying them with alcohol and drugs before having sex with them.

Both men pleaded guilty at Preston Crown Court to abduction, sexual activity with a child and the supply of a controlled drug.

Despite being told explicitly by police and social services that both girls were under-age and should be returned to care, the men picked up one girl from a children's home in Blackburn and then drove on to collect her friend who was living in temporary foster care in North Wales.

Naveed, from Burnley, gave one girl the first of five Ecstasy tablets at a motorway service station before having sex with her on the back seat of the car while the group drove back to Lancashire. The court was told that the two men later took the girls to an address in Blackburn where Hussain, from Blackburn, had sex with the second girl and gave her a total of ten Ecstasy tablets.


In addition to "grooming" the girls to gain their confidence, the men drugged them -- fairly extensively -- prior to having sex with them.

Yesterday Judge Andrew Gilbart, QC, jailed the two Asian men under new sex laws designed to protect youngsters from being groomed for sexual activity. Judge Gilbart said: "This is a truly shocking offence. You knew them. They were exploited for sex by the two of you. No other description is possible. They were under-age girls who you knew it was your responsibility to protect and not exploit."


If it was their responsibility to protect and not exploit, then the mice were in charge of the cheese.

If you really want a response from the "Asian" community, do the following: Declare that this is an honor crime against the families of the girls, and that the only way to cleanse the honor of the victims' families is to execute the perpetrators -- and then whack these two guys.

At the very least, the penalty should be chemical castration.

It's not, and that's why these guys do it -- they know they can get away with it. The police will "explicitly" warn them before trouble starts.

Try going to certain "Asian" countries (Pakistan) and victimizing their people -- you will be tortured, then executed, though not necessarily convicted!

Where is the PC elite? They are shutting up because of the protected status of the perpetrators. They can't condone the activity (or perhaps they do?), but neither will they speak out against the "Asian" immigrants:

The trial came amid growing concern at the attitudes of some Asian men towards white girls which campaigners for women claim few people wish to address.

Parents have complained that in parts of the country with large Asian communities white girls as young as 12 are being targeted for sex by older Asian men yet the authorities are unwilling to act because of fears of being labelled racist.


The reason they target twelve-year-olds is because they rape the girls when they turn 13 -- the age at which the protection offered by the laws changes, making the authorities have to wait for the girls to come forward and complain to launch an investigation.

Ann Cryer, a Labour member of the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee, has been at the forefront of attempting to tackle the problem after receiving complaints from mothers in her constituency about young Asian men targeting their under-age daughters.

Although campaigners claim that hundreds of young girls are already being passed around men within the Asian community for sex, she said that attempts to raise the problem with community leaders had met with little success, with most of them being in a state of denial about it.


A state of denial -- they don't even want to say these are Pakistanis, so they call them "Asians". The Vietnamese, Koreans, Chinese, Japanese, etc., ought to be screaming about this.

Hell, the Brits ought to be screaming about this.

Say they are Pakistanis, and tell everybody what they are doing. When the PC elite call you racists, fire back at the PC elite, that they are aiding and abetting child-abusing, drug-pushing rapist-pimps, because that is exactly what is happening.

After the case, the mother of one of the girls, who cannot be named for legal reasons, welcomed the jail terms. "This will hopefully act as a warning to others," the woman said. She had had to leave the court as details of the men’s sexual relations with the teenagers were read out. After the trial, Ms Cryer said that young Asian men were caught between two cultures having been brought up in a Western society in families while retaining the cultural values of the Asian sub-continent.

She said: "The family and cultural norms of their community means they are expected to marry a first cousin or other relative back in a village in Mirapur or wherever the family comes from. Therefore, until that marriage is arranged they look out for sex.

"At the point in their lives when they are ready for this sort of activity, Asians cannot go to Asian girls because it would be a terrible breach of the honour of the community and their family to have sex with an Asian girl before marriage." She said that the reason Asian men targeted very young white girls was because older white girls knew that a relationship with an Asian youth was unlikely to last as the community would seek an arranged marriage with someone from the Asian sub-continent. Police and groups campaigning to protect women insisted that the grooming of youngsters is not segregated along race lines, though there is concern at the attitudes of some young Asian men towards white girls.

Parents claim that criminal networks are able to prey on young girls because the authorities are reluctant to tackle the issue for fear of upsetting race relations in areas of the North West with large ethnic minority communities.

However, Ms Cryer added: "I think there is a problem with the view Asian men generally have about white women. Their view about white women is generally fairly low. They do not seem to understand that there are white girls as moral and as good as Asian girls."


Again, I call your attention to the way they are speaking about this in code: "Asian men" and "Asian girls".

Many of the "Asian" immigrants in the UK are from Pakistan. They are for the most part Muslims. This is not to imply that all Pakistanis are causing problems, or that all Muslims are causing problems, or that all Pakistani Muslims are causing problems.

However, if calling these perpetrators "Muslims" or "Pakistanis" is racist, then it is even more racist to call them "Asians" -- as if all people of any kind of Asian background were involved!

The PC elite thought-police, driving everyone to use the term "Asians", is instilling its own brands of racism: first, they are slandering anyone from any part of Asia, when the culprits are only some (not all!) Pakistanis; second, they are denying justice to victims who are not "Asians".

The issue here is that this activity is organized, and the organizations involved in it are Muslims from Pakistan.

In other countries, in Sweden and Norway for example, Muslim immigrants have a similar pattern of behavior victimizing the women of their host society. Instead of plying young girls with drugs, the immigrants there brutally gang-rape the women, and since they merely overcome the victims with force, they can go after victims who are older; targeting younger girls is only necessary when one is attempting to gain their trust, and so needs a victim who is more naive.

The explanations are the same, however: the infidel women are abused for sex, so it is a sexual jihad; for marriage, they seek "decent" women from their own culture. The blogger Fjordman has written extensively about the situation in the Nordic countries, and has documented this thoroughly. I recommend you read Fjordman's work, and learn about the connection between the permissive attitudes regarding these types of criminal activities, and the PC elites that have these attitudes.

I challenge the Politically Correct elements in the UK to look into whether Islam plays a role here. Do these perpetrators consider themselves Muslims? If so, are they practicing Muslims? Do they justify their activities with reference to Islamic texts? Or, if they consider themselves Muslims, do they believe that what they are doing is wrong according to Islamic laws and traditions?

In short: Is plying young girls with drugs and then raping them and renting them out for sex to others a form of sexual jihad, or is this merely disgusting and despicable criminal activity?

And for my readers who are decent people, and who happen to be either Pakistani or Muslim, there is no need to be offended: we know you do not condone this activity, and we know that any society has its criminal element.

The criminal element in British society are the elitists who allow these heinous crimes to go either inadequately punished, or unpunished and unacknowledged altogether.


Another article addressing this matter came out the same day, entitled 'If it had been white guys, it would have been reported sooner' by Lucy Bannerman, August 11, 2007:

Some parents, support workers and community leaders claim that an ugly pattern has emerged across Lancashire and Yorkshire in particular in which vulnerable, white, working-class girls are being used for sex by groups of older and predominantly Asian men.

Once the girls have moved into these social circles, they are encouraged to rebel, with peer pressure leading to petty crime, says Samantha Pratt, of CROP, the Leeds-based Coalition for the Removal of Pimping.

The victims become criminalised themselves, she said. "A lot of these kids are getting ASBOs and being treated as if they are naughty teenagers. But these men are puppeteers."

This is a universal pattern, familiar throughout communities across Britain. Julie (not her real name), whose 13-year-old daughter fell prey to this kind of sexual exploitation, believes that, in her case, sensitivity about perceived racism led to a reluctance to tackle the problem. "There must be hundreds of girls going through the same thing. But I felt I had a brick wall to knock down before you even got to the real issue. I do believe if it had been white guys, it would have been reported a lot sooner."

She believes that the men have no respect for the victims. "These guys think the girls are white trash. They know what they can get away with."


Therein lies the problem with what this new-age political correctness has done: criminals know they can get away with their crimes, from the cathouse to the White House.

It is a point picked up by Abdul Hamid Qureshi, chairman of the Lancashire Council of Mosques.

"We in the Muslim community are failing in the sense that there are young people in society with little or no moral values. After the age of 12, nobody is engaging with them. We have to transform ourselves.

"It is not just white girls being exploited. Asian girls are involved too, but their numbers are less. There is less access to them, and the criminals are more likely to be deterred by their fathers and brothers, who they know will come after them."

He rejected an argument by Ann Cryer, the local MP, that forbidden extramarital sex and the expectation of arranged marriage is leading Asian men to use white girls for sex.

He said: "I think that is a shallow way of looking at it. This is a social evil. We have to put up enough barriers so that it becomes difficult for [these men] to operate."


The argument made by Ann Cryer is the same as that made elsewhere, and makes sense. It is possible that Chairman Qureshi is right, though.

Regardless, while the perpetrators come from a Muslim/Pakistani background, it would be interesting to know whether they actually practice Islam, and whether they attend a mosque. In short, does Islam play a role here?

The Islamic community needs to help identify these people and bring them to justice. If Muslims don't, they run the risk of being lumped in with the criminals, conspirators through silence, conspirators after-the-fact.

Chairman Qureshi hits it spot-on (emphasis added):

"Asian girls are involved too, but their numbers are less. There is less access to them, and the criminals are more likely to be deterred by their fathers and brothers, who they know will come after them."

The voting public and its elected officials might wish to consider my suggestion:

Declare that this is an honor crime against the families of the girls, and that the only way to cleanse the honor of the victims' families is to execute the perpetrators -- and then whack these two guys.

No comments: